War Time Memories of Mum and Dad Seymour

These photos and memories of Vanessa Golton’s parents have been pieced together by research undertaken by Vanessa and kindly shared with the New Forest Remembers Project.

Margaret Winifred Probert and James Henry Seymour were married at Ringwood Parish Church of St.Peter and St.Paul, The Market place, Ringwood, on 25th November 1941.

It was a basic Wartime wedding; mainly arranged by Margaret, whilst Jim was training hard with the Navy, ready to go to sea. There is only one photo from the wedding.
Margaret
Margaret was in the ATS (Auxiliary Territorial Service) at the beginning of the war, the ATS training school was at The Grange Hotel, Southbourne, Bournemouth.
After the wedding Margaret applied to move to The Land Army, permission was granted in the summer of 1941.
She worked in The Land Army, at Lance Robert’s market garden farm, in Poulner, Ringwood. Lance Roberts was a good employer, and became a good family friend.
James
James was born and grew up at the family home, Merryweather farm. The farm is on Southampton Road (previously Poulner lane/Home street), Ringwood. The Farm provided milk and other dairy products to Ringwood, and also sent milk further a field, via the railway station at Ringwood.
Merryweather farmhouse itself, is still there, but is now split into flats and surrounded by the modern houses at Chaffey close, next to the Ambulance station at Poulner, with Poulner scout hall sited on what once, was the farm’s orchard. The A31 now cuts through the farm’s land, to the rear of the house. The mount was also part of the farms land; it has now been extensively developed, with houses covering almost all of it. Jim’s father, Thomas Seymour and his wife Ellen, would have continued running the farm during the war.
During WW2, Jim was a Chief petty officer, in the Navy. He left shortly after his wedding day, to serve in Egypt. He served at Tobruk and then El Alamein in 1942, where he suffered a perforated eardrum. An injury, that troubled him in some ways, for the rest of his life.
His letters home, indicate how much he misses home, his family and his new wife. In a letter home, dated 4th April 1942 to Margaret, he is sounding particularly homesick and longing for British Spring time weather, rather than the heat, sand and flies, in the desert area, where he is. A record called “September in the rain” is on the radio, reminding him of when he first met Margaret. On research, I have found that the songs lyrics were by Al Dublin and the Music by Harry Warren, 1937, when Mum was 17 and Dad, 22. It was also the music for the film “Melody for Two”.
The main ways to pass time, when James did have spare time, seemed to be card games, darts, playing football, including getting local teams and other service teams to play each other, water polo and swimming competitions. There were cinemas (picture houses), another favourite pass time. He preferred to work on the night shift, to avoid the desert heat, and then if possible, to take a morning swim. Most of the time, letters were censored, and locations could not be mentioned. Although, some clues did on occasions, get through to home.

Meanwhile, back in Ringwood, Margaret was kept very busy in the land army. Ringwood had its picture house, but Mum was probably not so keen to go, without Dad. The Crown hotel sometimes held dances, a chance for friends and family to have light relief from the stresses of war.

Her home during the war was mainly a flat, above her father (Leslie Charles Probert) butcher’s shop at 29 Southampton road, Ringwood. At present, Barrow Bros & Tapper funeral service premises. She also spent a lot of time at her Father’s family home, Berwyn Bank, at Poulner Hill Ringwood. The house is still there. As well as being the Probert’s family home, some American soldiers also stayed there during the war.  Some of the Americans played Gospel music, particularly loved by one of Margaret’s brothers, John Probert.
Margaret’s father, Leslie, was a Sergeant in the secret auxiliary unit of the local Home Guard, also known as Churchill’s Secret Army. Other members were fellow Ringwood shopkeepers and businessmen. Leading an important role in England’s defence, with a few humorous unconfirmed Dad’s Army type stories as well. One Ringwood example is a fellow member, shooting himself in the foot, after Grandad built a booby trap in his shop.
James’ letters from late summer, early autumn 1944, are posted from Chatham, Kent, and Portsmouth.
So at last, he was back in England, able to visit his wife at weekends, via train and bus. That must have been a wonderful feeling, to be back safely in England again.
There was a very happy event to follow, on June 26th 1945, the birth of Margaret and Jim’s first child, a Daughter, Pamela.
Dad had to spend until summer 1946, still in the Navy, based in a mixture of Barracks and rented accommodation in Portsmouth. So he probably only saw his wife and new baby Pamela at weekends. After leaving the Navy, he was able to live back in Ringwood, full time. Working as an engineer at Wellworthys, until his retirement in 1980.
Margaret and Jim went on to have three more children, after Pamela. David, Brenda and myself, Vanessa.
If you have similar memories and photos of your parents, please share them with us. Likewise if you have any information on the Auxillary Units in or around the New Forest

 

Wartime Excavation of Bronze Age Barrows on Beaulieu Heath and Stoney Cross

This series of letters in the National Archives detailing the trials and tribulations of attempting to undertake essential excavation work on scheduled monuments in partnership with departments requisitioning land and building essential structures and sites for the war effort. The first few letters from the chief excavator Mrs Cecily Margaret (Known as Peggy) Piggott reveal some of the results of the excavations and detail some of the issues of undertaking archaeology in the New Forest. The last two show some of the discussions going on behind closed doors on the importance of such work. The final paragraph of the last letter firmly state the importance of the work being undertaken and confirm it will continue.

You can read more about Peggy’s excavation results in the Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society available in the library of the New Forest Heritage Centre: Excavation of Fifteen Barrows in the New Forest; 1941-2

For further reading and articles on Beaulieu or Stoney Cross Airfield please visit: Beaulieu Airfield Overview or Stoney Cross Overview

The following transcriptions of the letters photographed above from the National Archives (Work.14’1393), if you can make out some of the (ineligible) words then please let us know and we will update the article.

Letter 1

Hatchet Mill, Beaulieu, Hants, 2/10/41

Dear Mr O’Neil
I wonder if this circular which has been sent to Roger means very much and whether he ought to do something about getting into the army. I told him I thought not, but he is anxious to have a statement from an official (source), so will you clarify the position for us? Also will you return the form as he wants to file it?
The excavation is going ahead well. Though we could easily employ twice the number of men. Roughly speaking the results are as follows:-
1.    Lower Bronze Age unaccompanied cremation
2.    Plan of a ‘totenhaus’, square and with a pitched roof and the whole in a square pit 2.5’ deep. (presumably) Early Bronze Age no finds. Will send you photograph  soon and it is obviously of first importance
2(a). A (Mamain?) barrow I think. Small and with Iron Age (carinated) and flat rim pottery which I think is (Mamain?) large portions of wood and iron nail and bronze object. Barrow small and not officially one to be done.
3.    In process of excavation.

So you see we are getting really interesting and informative results and are grateful for you making it possible. Can’t you come sometime? The house plan in Barrow II is still open and will be for one week or so (70 – 40 post holes in it)
Will you please let me hear from you as soon as possible?
Roger and I are getting on well together and it would be impossible without him.
Yours Peggy.

It is still vague about how many and which I am supposed to be doing. There are no more on the (runways) at least 8 more (near) enough to be removed I should think. If so, more labour will be necessary as the area is under water in winter. I really would like to hear from you.

Letter 2

Hatchet Mill, Beaulieu, Hants, 3/10/41

Dear Bryan
Thank you for (removing) the (ineligible) which I’ve always disliked but felt shy of dispensing with. I’m glad to have heard that you are coming down here and will leave the centre of Barrow II open for you to see, and we should also have got the middle of Barrow IV open by then. I was thinking that if Lymington is very full and you are unable to book a room, I’m sure Richard Atkinson would put you up in his caravan for a night or so.
I read your letter to Roger and he has decided to write to (Bright), but to take no immediate action. This is a great relief to me because the men are young and inclined to be insubordinate even with a foreman so without that it would be almost hopeless. As it is they go off at 5 or so nearly every day as they are earning more money than they want or need. This leaves us a great many working hours and we are therefore trying our best to get more labour because (1) the barrows are so big that nothing less than 25’ square removed in the centre is enough, and (2) the weather will get increasingly worse and the evenings dark earlier.
I was glad to (receive) the films and expect to have the first lot of photographs ready to show you on Thursday
With best wishes
Peggy Piggott

Yes I could certainly go out to Stoney Cross, I have been there myself to look around. The clerk of the works on this has just come to live at this place and has the final plans. At the moment unless this alters I have 6 more to do – 10 in all.
(then) there is a separate building site which may mean some more!

p.s. have just lost all the (coupons) for October. Think they were pinched. (But) unless you bring (coupons) – no hope for Stoney Cross

Letter 3

Beaulieu Heath
O’Neil
An additional sum of £300 will be required to complete the excavation at Beaulieu Heath. I attach the rough estimate which prehaps you will send to A.S 22 Rhyl, with a covering note explaining why the additional sum is required. (17.10.41)

A.S.22
When we started this work we were uncertain how many barrows would be destroyed by the construction of the aerodrome, but thought about 5. We now know that 10 and a linear earthwork will disappear. Most (interesting results) have already been obtained

Hand written note: Expected that Mrs Piggott will finish about 15/11/41 (O’N 15/11)

Letter 4

Hatchet Mill near Beaulieu, Hants, 6.11.41

Dear Bryan,
This is to tell you the latest news of the excavations. You may be pleased to hear that we found an amber necklace of Wessex Culture type in the barrow called Coldpixies Cavern near the road – nothing else of particular importance. I’m afraid I have not been able to date the linear earthwork but had expected to – but have cut a section.
Now with regard to Stoney Cross. We shall finish here in 3 weeks unless weather conditions hold us up considerably. There is not a lot more to do and I think by the end of the month we should be through.
Therefore I would like to know as soon as you can let me know what interval is to elapse between this and the next dig. I should suggest a week to 10 days and Roger (who has a week due to him I understand) could be away then. But he says that if it is more than a week he must know his position with the H.M.O.W (Ministry of Works?). He naturally doesn’t want to go on the dole.
I suggest that the stuff is left with Rashley and then sent by him on the date decided on to Stoney Cross – which would be about 8th December. The Stoney Cross job will take about 5 weeks if we have the same number of men. The labour ought to be possible from Fordingbridge I should think.
Please will you write as soon as possible then I can arrange with Roger
With best wishes
Peggy

Letter 5

Ministry of Labour and National Service
Queen Anne’s Chambers, Westminster, SW1
Telephone: Whitehall 7010
20 November 1941
E.M 13867/41.
Your Ref: E.D.2/1941
G.L.Jordan, Esq.,
Ministry of Works & Buildings
Lambeth Bridge House, S.E.1

Dear Jordan
I have asked our Regional Offices to take the necessary action to place in important work the Ancient Monument workman specified in the list enclosed with your letter of 23rd October, and I hope to let you know the results in due course.
One of our inspectors has reported that Messers. Rashley & Co. of Lymington have a contract with your department for the removal of remains from earthworks at Beaulieu Heath, where runways for Royal Air force Station are being laid down. Six labourers are employed on the job, and our inspector has represented that, pressed as we are to find labour for vital contracts, this work is hard to justify.
I shall be grateful if you would look into this matter, or if it is not within your province, pass it on to the proper quarter.
Yours Sincerely
J. O Comont

Letter 6

Ministry of Works & Buildings
Palace Hotel
26. November 1941

Dear Mr Comont
Jordan has sent on to me your letter of 20th November (E.M13867/41) in which you refer to the work we are doing at Beaulieu Heath. The construction of areodromes in rural areas in England often involves the complete destruction of pre-historic earthworks which are Ancient Monuments scheduled under the Ancient Monuments Acts. This necessity is unfortunate but unavoidable. We accordingly made arrangements with the Air Ministry that we should be given facilities to excavate the earthworks scientifically, in order to record the evidence they contain of the pre-history of the country before they are flattened out. The Air Ministry are in entire sympathy with our work and we are indebted to them for both facilities and valuable assistance. The work is done in consultation with their Superintending Engineers and is, in our opinion, of very great importance. We could not, and we do not think that instructive opinion would expect us to stand by and see these important memorials of our history destroyed unrecorded.
Yours Sincerely,
A Miller

 

Whales at Marchwood

A series of photos showing the construction of ‘Whales’ the road elements of Mulberry Harbour at Marchwood Military Port. All photos are credit the National Archives (WO240/2)

Marchwood, the Beaulieu River and nearby Lepe played very important roles in the construction of temporary Mulberry Harbours, which consisted of ‘Spuds’ (pier heads), ‘Whales’ (roads) and ‘Beetles’ (pontoons). These experimental units were towed across the English Channel to successfully disembark troops, machinery and supplies on the Normandy beaches circumnavigating the heavily defended French harbours.

In November 1943 a new military port was built at Marchwood to specifically assist with Mulberry Harbour construction in the build up to D Day and to give extra docking space for the ever increasing number of vessels waiting in Southampton Water for the Normandy landings.

It became the base for the newly formed No. 1 Port and Inland Water Transport Repair Depot, Royal Engineers. The unit’s responsibilities included the construction of Mulberry Harbour components; particularly the floating spans made up of the ‘Whales’ roadways and ‘Beetles’ support pontoons

Wates Group Ltd. construction firm, who had been employed to build elements of Mulberry, also built a slipway and other facilities. Part of the waterfront was also roofed over so that Mulberry construction could continue in bad weather.

You can find out more about the New Forest’s vital role in D-Day from Mulberry Harbour, to holding camps, road widening, advanced landing grounds, PLUTO and Embarkation by visiting our main page on D-Day in the New Forest.

WO240 Papers contain information about War Office: Mulberry Harbours; Photos

Where to park your D-Day Landing craft?

There are many stories about the sheer volume of men and machines residing in the New Forest during the build up to D Day. There was also a common story doing the rounds that a person could walk across to the Isle of Wight from the New Forest without getting their feet wet due to the sheer number of landing craft in the Solent.

These two maps are berthing plans for the Solent in the build up to D Day and show where the various landing craft would be moored. They do show that there was parking for numerous vessels. Unfortunately it looks like the bit about getting to the Isle of Wight might have been misleading due to the navigation channel left down the centre of the Solent for ships to move.

These maps are reproduced with the permission of: Portsmouth D Day Museum and St Barbe Museum & Art Gallery, Lymington. They show two different background maps, but both show the parking plan for where to moor your landing craft and hopefully find it again later on.

You can find out more about the New Forest’s vital role in D-Day from Mulberry Harbour, to holding camps, road widening, advanced landing grounds, PLUTO and Embarkation by visiting our main page on D-Day in the New Forest.

White Moor Rifle Range – Lyndhurst

Historic Ordnance Survey maps from the second half of the 19th century show a number of rifle ranges scattered about the New Forest. It is still possible to see visible traces of these ranges surviving at Long Bottom, Lyndhurst, Burley and Brockenhurst. A number of the ranges were then adapted or changed for potential WWI and then WWII use.

At White Moor you can still see the faint mounds from the firing off points, the blast banks of a magazine to the north of the range, various mounds associated with the markers huts and the earth mounds of the target butts. The 2011 Lidar image shows these arranged across White Moor.

The range at White Moor had numerous firing off points at either 100 or 50 yard intervals, slightly dictated by the landscape.

The New Forest centre hold an image of the range painted by Sir Charles Burrard  in 1861. The view looks from the 900 yard firing off point towards the target butts.

Though White moor may have been in use during WWI, it does not appear on the 1943 New Forest Training Map as an active range suggesting it wasn’t in use during WWII.

Volunteer Rifle Ranges, A Brief History

In early 1859, it was generally believed that the Emperor Napoleon III of France had ambitions to dominate Europe, as his uncle had fifty years before; and among other moves was planning to invade Southern England and the fear was that Hampshire would be on the front line. There was a fear that, if the Royal Navy was unable to prevent a French landing, the Regular Army with a large proportion of its strength in India and on colonial service would be too small to repel the invaders.

Lord Palmerston, the Prime Minister, ordered the strengthening of a number of south coast defences including Hurst and Calshot Castle in the 1850s.

At the same time the government was urged to re-form the Volunteer forces, which had been raised previously between 1793 and 1813, but had then been largely disbanded, and the formation of a Volunteer Rifle Force was subsequently agreed.

Each local Corps was intended to be independent and meet its own expenses for uniform, drill hall, drill sergeants, rifle range etc. The government would, however, supply Long Enfield muzzle loading rifles and make grants based on attendance and standard of marksmanship.

The Volunteers were not initially intended as front line soldiers. The emphasis was on proficient marksmanship with the rifle. Volunteer sharpshooters would operate in small units and their intimate knowledge of their districts would make their most effective role in operating on the flanks and communications of the enemy. Drill was therefore kept to a minimum and uniform was as simple as possible.

In December 1861, the 1st Administrative Battalion Hants Rifle Volunteers was created to establish uniformity in training among the six independent companies that had come into being in the Winchester area. Apart from his weekly local training a Volunteer was expected to attend eight official exercises each four months under regular Army instructors.

The role of the Volunteers was gradually brought closer-to that of the Regular Army. In 1880 the 1st Administrative Battalion was consolidated with the 1st Hampshire Rifle Volunteer Corps, in which the individual Companies lost their independent status and became lettered Companies.

Eventually, in 1908, the citizen army of the Rifle Volunteers, which had expanded greatly during the Boer War, was absorbed, along with the County Militia, into the Territorial Forces (renamed Territorial Army in 1921). The 1st Hants provided the 4th Battalion the Hampshire Regiment, which was organised, equipped and trained on Regular Army lines and was intended in the event of war to relieve one of the regular Battalions which would then be available to fight in France.

Napoleonic Rifle Ranges – History Hit Film

This short clip provides a bit more history about some of the Napoleonic rifle ranges that can be found across the New Forest.

 

White Moor WWI & WWII Rifle Range

At Brockenhurst a roughly triangular area of plain  that is bordered on the west by the A35, on the north by Rhinefield Road and the south by Wilverley Inclosure and Burley Road is recorded as a large Field Firing Area on the 1943 New Forest Training Area Map.

Further war diary research has indicated that both infantry and armoured units trained here during the war (War Diary 33 Army Tank Brigade) and photographs and videos of tank manoeuvres have also been identified. These can be found on this site: Here and Here.

The Training map also identifies an old rifle range immediately east of the Field Firing Area. This 1,000 rifle range first appears on the 1910 Ordnance Survey map just north of the Weir and supersedes an earlier  range recorded on the 1870 Ordnance Survey map (Image above) that was just south of the Weir. This earlier range was originally set up as one of the three Rifle Volunteer Corps ranges that can be found in the New Forest at Brockenhurst, Burley and Lyndhurst. The Brockenhurst Weirs Rifle Range is marked as disused on the 1898 Ordnance Survey map. It is possible that local geography; boggy ground and hillocks prevented the original range to the south from being extended to reflect the greater firepower of later weaponry.

Visible today

It is possible to visit some the of the surviving earthworks of the original 1870 range. The Butts mound survives with a scar where the targets have been removed. The mantelet marked on the 1870 range just to the north west of firing off point at 150 yards survives as a small mound and the lidar images of the area show straight ditched trackways running the length of at least 500 yards from the butts to the 500 yard firing off point.

In regards to the WWI and WWII range a rifle butt and several chalk markings are visible on historic WWII aerial photography and modern aerial photography. Visiting the site today reveals numerous earth mounds, concrete signal boxes, the base of the butts and the concrete foundation for the target.

The latest iteration of the range in WWII was set up firing in a westerly direction from distances of 90m, 180m, 270m, 360m, 450m and 540m; a downsize from the 1,000 rifle range. The distances suggest that the range was also used for side arm training.

The 2011 lidar survey image of the area (linked above) has the stream running across the middle of the image, to the north of which you can see the rectangular firing off points of the latest version of the range. Below the stream you can identify the butts for the original range and line of range. You can also see the gravel quarry marked on the historic ordnance survey maps.

 

Will Buckland Rings Reveal its secrets? – Abstract & Video

The following paper was presented at the New Forest Knowledge Conference 2017 entitled: New Forest Historical Research and Archaeology: who’s doing it? Below you will find the abstract of the paper and a video of the paper given if permission to film it was given by the speaker.

Speaker:

Josie Hagan, Bournemouth University

Abstract

I am a student placement from Bournemouth University spending a year working with the New Forest National Park Authority

After working in a variety of roles and helping staff I commenced my final project, which involved a Geophysical Survey of Buckland Rings.

The Geophysical Survey of Buckland Rings was to investigate if there was any evidence of settlement within the Hillfort, which had previously been excavated in the 1930’s by Hawkes and surveyed in the 1990’s by the Royal Commission, but was still relatively unknown.

The survey lasted a total of six days, and with the help from Bournemouth University students and New Forest Volunteers a total of 4 hectares was covered.

The results from the survey uncovered potential internal round houses, linear features and the trenches from Hawkes excavation within the Hillfort, and also some Medieval field systems just to the east of the site, which were previously unknown.

To set these findings in the wider landscape, Buckland Rings is in very close proximity to Ampress, which lies just to the east. While Ampress has been built over and is now part of a waterworks, some radiocarbon dates have been obtained from the site, which suggest the site may have been Saxon or Danish. This evidence in conjunction with the findings of Medieval settlement around Buckland Rings could indicate to both sites being multi-phase sites, with long periods of settlement.

The next step in finding out more from Buckland Rings and its place in the wider landscape would be to have a small community excavation, which will hopefully take place this year.

The Talk

Wing Leader Johnnie Johnson and the Secret Plan that links Homsley South and D-Day

When F/O Louis Emile Cochand finally arrived in Britain, he was an experienced fighter pilot, but he was still very lucky to be assigned a wing commander Canadians knew and trusted. It was Johnnie Johnson, not only a British ace but a man who already had experience leading hot shot Canadian flyboys. In the spring of 1943, Johnnie was asked to take over an all Canadian wing based at Kenley. Johnnie had flown with Canadians before but this was to be a wing equipped with the new Spitfire Mk.IX. In his autobiography:

“The Canadian fighter pilots had a reputation for toughness and they required a firm hand on the reins. I thought of Bader and how often he’d sworn by the Canadians.”

Johnnie describes his warm welcome and the meeting with his new Canadian wing of over 70 pilots from Nova Scotia and right across the Dominion. There was at least one other all Canadian Spitfire wing, the 126th commanded by ‘Iron Bill” MacBrian.

The new Spitfire Mk.IX had a larger more powerful engine and Johnnie hoped it would be more than a match for the Focke-Wulfe 190s. He quickly came to the conclusion that it was better than both the Focke-Wulfe and the Messerschmitt, the only disadvantage was the range of less than 200 miles, which severely limited time over France and the support they could give to bombers. Although the deep thrusts of the Eight Air Force had tied down most of the Luftwaffe’s day fighters, the Spits were busy with Messerschmitt’s and Focke-Wulfes on the Pas de Calais. Their real advantage was the huge advantage of radar, knowing where and when the enemy fighters were up. By the end of the summer 1943, the Canadian wing had accounted for 100 kills.

One of Johnnie’s squadron leaders was ‘the burly assertive ‘Buck’ McNair, who had already been through the thick of the air fighting over Malta (ten victories).’ By the end of 1943, Johnnie was bone weary and moved to a desk job in operations.

Early in 1944, Johnnie had a visit from Paul Davoud, who before the war had been a bush pilot in Canada. The R.C.A.F was sending a further six squadrons (two of which had been in action in the Aleutians against the Japanese) to England for the long awaited invasion of France.

 

The Canadians wanted Johnnie back.

Johnnie organised his batman, his dog and loaded his Lagonda for the drive north to Digby in Norfolk to meet his new Canadian wing.

 

And F/O Louis Cochand.

Unlike some of the eighty Canadian pilots, Louis was not completely green. Not only had he been a trainer in Commonwealth Air Training programme in Quebec and Ontario, but when Pearl Harbour was bombed and the Imperial Japanese forces launched a surprise attack on the Aleutian Islands, the Americans were caught by surprise, and asked for help from the Canadians. Louis was decorated by the grateful Americans for his effective attacks on Japanese forces.

Louis remembered Digby well and could with delight describe the delivery of the Spitfire Mk.IX flown in by attractive women ‘who just greased them down on the runway’.

 

D-Day was approaching, and there was a secret plan to secure air superiority in Normandy, a plan that involved a small airfield in the New Forest. “After two weeks of hard training at Digby we moved south to an airfield near Bournemouth, and took the opportunity to rehearse the operational procedure for the move of a tactical wing.” Johnnie recorded. Johnnie knew that his wing would be the first to land in France, re-fuel, re-arm and then continue to provide cover for the D-Day landings. It was an important tactical priority and would double the air-time of the fighters to insure air superiority.

Louis’ squadron was based at Holmsley South, one of the twelve air fields in the New Forest. From the new base, with their long range tanks, they could attack enemy fighters based at airfields near Paris and as Johnnie says:

“Within three weeks of receiving their Spitfires, the newcomers from Canada had flown like veterans and kept level heads under fire.”

 

More importantly, 442 Squadron was now experienced at landing and taking off from a small airfield, skills they needed for Normandy.

The wing then moved to Tangmere to prepare and train for the invasion. The new base and long range tanks meant the Spits could range as far as Brussels. Louvain and Ostende in the east, and south of Paris in the west attacking the Wehrmacht on the ground and meeting fighters and bombers in the air. Finally, it was time. June 5th 1944, Johnnie was with the group captains and wing leaders who were briefed about the next day’s invasion.

On D-Day, Johnnie led three squadrons across the Channel to patrol along the line of beaches being assaulted by the Canadian and British troops. Air superiority and surprise was such that Johnnie was actually more worried about the danger from American Typhoons over Omaha and Utah.

“Other than that, we were the undisputed masters of the Normandy sky.”

Johnnie was able to describe the panoply of conflict below while keeping below 2,000 feet and the shells of the naval guns. Louis also recollected the terrifying moment seeing a naval shell go by, fired inland by one of the Allied cruisers! The secret plan was up and running. The Canadian troops forging inland had taken their objective!

It was D-3 before Johnnie was contacted and told that the first airfield in Normandy was ready for fighters, inland from Juno Beach at St. Croix sur Mer. After a reconnaissance by Dal Russell checked out, the first Allied planes, all Canadian, were able to land and re-fuel in Normandy. It took 20 minutes and they were airborne again and back in the fight covering the beaches.

The landing strip was difficult to get into because of the air barrage balloons over Juno Beach, and not completely safe when you were down because of the risk of German snipers and of course minefields!

Within days the ground crews and equipment had come over from England. This included Johnnie’s batman, Varley, his Labrador Sally, and his caravan! Louis’s recollection was that he never saw his personal kit again!

With their new base, the Wing could fly deep into enemy territory and meet the challenge of the Luftwaffe reinforcements. It was pretty busy at St. Croix sur Mer and almost impossible to sleep because of the heavy guns, and the Bofors which opened up whenever the Luftwaffe appeared, and sleep was dangerous even if you could find room in a slit trench where you might be safe from falling hot shrapnel.

Louis recalled an occasion when a miss-calculation by another pilot on the ground in the confined space resulted in the back of his Spit being taken off just behind his armoured seat.

In the air, it was hot as well. Within a week the Wing had lost four Spits. The Wing was in constant action with Johnnie’s tally soon crossing 32 confirmed kills (the record set by ‘Sailor’ Malan in the Battle of Britain.

On the ground, there was a warm welcome from the French and Johnnie describes how he was grateful for the help of ‘one of the French-Canadians’ who acted as an interpreter when the mayor came to visit. It would have been Louis!

The pilots lived exclusively on compo rations.

“The Canadians deplored the absence of fresh meat, milk and fruit juices and wanted good fresh bread instead of hard biscuits.”

As Johnnie knew there was a daily flight with spares into the small field, he organised some extras with the publican of the Unicorn in Chichester. The next day the twin engined Anson flew in with a crate of tomatoes, loaves of new bread, some lobsters and a gallon or two of bitter! It wasn’t long before another bright spark modified the bomb racks on the replacement Spits so that a small barrel of beer could be carried instead.

The pilots were meeting and fighting the Luftwaffe daily over Normandy as the Germans desperately tried to regain lost ground and there were losses. The wing had been in Normandy for well over three weeks and Caen was still being resolutely defended. It fell to 144 Wing to cover the bombers that came in and reduced Caen to rubble. By D-Plus 30 the Canadians had accounted for 52 confirmed kills, just pipping the more experienced 127 Wing. The final score was 74 confirmed with many more damaged, and the loss of only 14 pilots, 2 whom who were confirmed safe. Johnnie was sad to say good-bye to what he later described as his “Happy, aggressive Canadian Wing”.

The Wing was then broken up for operational reasons. Johnnie took 443 back to the England while Dal Russell and his 442 (with Louis and my uncle Mac Hume) was transferred to 126 Wing with Dal as Wing Commander. They were to join the 2nd Tactical Air Force and take part in the adventurous trek across Northwest Europe through France, Belgium and Holland.

Later, Louis and Mac were able to personally liberate their cousins, the Famille Cochard, at their home in Uccle, an event well remembered by Denise and Anne-Marie, only teen-agers at the time.

For flying exploits over the invasion, Louis was recommended for the D.F.C. by the British and awarded the Croix de Guerre by the French.

C.M.C.

February 3rd, 2015.

You can find out more about the various activities of Holmsley South in this overview article: Holmsley South Airfield – Overview and you can find out more about the New Forest’s vital role in D-Day from Mulberry Harbour, to holding camps, road widening, advanced landing grounds, PLUTO and Embarkation by visiting our main page on D-Day in the New Forest.

Yew Tree Heath Anti-Aircraft Battery S.16

Yew Tree Heath was a Heavy Anti-Aircraft site (HAA) gun battery built on the high ground east of Beaulieu Road. War diary entries show that the site was designated S.16 and housed four 3-inch AA guns when activated in 1939 (WO 166/2262). These were replaced by Vickers 3.7 inch AA guns later in the war.

In November 1939, an Ordnance Survey Triangulation Pillar was built at Yew Tree Heath, adjacent to the AA battery. It was computed as tertiary triangulation station SU31/T159 in 1942, assisting in the triangulation of the New Forest and the eventual post-war move to the National Grid mapping system (Ordnance Survey, 2018). The Ordnance Survey Triangulation Pillar was used and maintained until 1977 (Ordnance Survey, 2018).

War Diary research indicates that during an occupation of HAA sites on the 24th August 1939, the armament plan called for four 3” guns at Yew Tree Heath, although none were yet installed. 213 Battery occupied the site in September with 3” guns, but these were removed between October 10th and 12th. In February 1940, four 3.7” guns were deployed; by April only two of these were static and the other two were mobile and not fully installed. By June, this armament had been reduced to two static guns, but by July, four static guns were in place. 217 Battery took over the site and in October only two static guns were recorded. During this period, the battery made frequent engagements of enemy aircraft (WO 166/2262).

This constant movement of guns continued for several years. In July 1941, only two guns were emplaced, rising to four 3.7” guns a year later. An armament return in August 1944 (WO 166/14635) states that the battery was armed with four 4.7” guns as well as what is likely to be a Bofors Light AA (LAA) gun, 11 machine gun positions, and a searchlight. By November, the site is alleged to have had four 5.25” guns, but this seems unlikely. These guns were significantly larger than 3.7” guns and would have required considerable modification to the emplacements that are not evident in the 1946 photographs. However, this may indicate an intention rather than an actual installation of the guns and could provide an alternative explanation for a site to the west. In the 1946 photographs, a significant ancillary site has appeared to the west of the battery – a new access road leading to a circular loop. An apparent semi-sunken circular emplacement, approximately 11m in diameter, is visible on the south east side of the loop road and significant excavations are visible around the rest, including a circular marking the same size as the pit. The emplacement’s dimensions closely match those of a standard 5.25” sunken gun position. It is possible that the entire western site is an expansion of the battery with the intended provision of four 5.25” gun emplacements. If this is the case, the fact it had not been completed in 1946 suggests it was never finished. Further evidence of this comes from the fact that there is now an extractive pit at the site of the completed emplacement (suggesting it was removed), but there are no other such pits around the site.

With the movement of the front line across Europe and the eventual capture of enemy airfields and V1 and V2 installations, the need for extensive AA defence in Britain decreased. Gun batteries were slowly wound down in early 1945 and many sites were disarmed and vacated by their units. However, a force was required to defend Britain from the new threat of Communist Russia and by January 1946, 210 HAA sites nationwide had been selected to be retained as part of “Nucleus Force”. These included several of the Solent defences, including all five pre-war HAA batteries (Hardley, Marchwood, Hounsdown, Haxland and Yew Tree Heath). However, only Hardley and Hounsdown retained their armament, with the other batteries’ weapons described as being “off-site”; weapons and equipment were held at nearby depots.

Yew Tree Heath battery is clearly disarmed in the 1946 aerial photographs. Although the scheme was reduced in late 1946, the sites remained ready to use until 1950. The aerial photography shows that the guns were arranged in concrete emplacements around a central command post, with ancillary buildings, stores and accommodation just south of the gun position. This set up was very typical of HAA gun battery layouts.  There are no known photographs of the site in action so we include some example photos so you can see what was or may have been there.

It has not been possible to identify when the site was given up by the War Office, although this would presumably have followed soon after the abandonment of the Nucleus Force. The 1962 National Grid map suggests that the bulk of the battery has been removed. The only features marked are the original concrete access tracks leading to the gun positions and the Radar site. Two buildings are indicated close to the gun positions, on either side of the track. These buildings match the locations of buildings shown on the 1946 aerial photographs, but have been deleted on the 1970 map, although the tracks remain. Both maps also indicate a rectangular feature that matches the large concrete apron east of the site visible in the 1946 photographs. The fact that a broken line is used to indicate the feature suggests that it is only a change in land surface and not a building.

The site didn’t just hold guns. It would have also had a Command position probably in the large ‘central’ mound.  To help aim the guns there was also a Vickers Predictor. June 1942 is the first time a radar is marked as installed on site; a GL Mk II. The installation of radar in gun batteries began in the early years of the war. There is no evidence of a specific radar installation on the 1940 or 1943 aerial photographs, although early radar units were typically mounted on the back of a truck. However, by 1946, a number of small installations are visible north of the battery, including a building some 175m north of the command post, but seemingly connected to it by a thin trench. This may be connected to radar, with the trench carrying cables connecting the radar to the battery.

Other equipment one may have seen at a HAA gun site include:

Kine-Theodolite
The Kine-Theodolite photographs the shell bursts.  This checks the targeting information from the Predictor crews, how close the gun crews are hitting to the target.

Height and Range Finders
Used for calculating the height and range of a target.  The calculated data was then passed to the Vickers Predictor and the Gun Post Officer.

R.Z. Detector
Little is known about this type of unit but it is thought to be used for early detection of enemy aircraft.

Generator
To provide power.

The gun site is now a Forestry Commission car park, recent site clearance reveals that several features are still extant, including concrete remains of the command post and all four gun positions remain as earthworks. As these features were typically semi submerged when built, there is potential for the survival of ammunition lockers in the gun pits and even individual rooms in the control bunker. Several other features such as a large concrete patch east of the guns and a large turning track way to the west need further research to identify their purpose and use.

Some rare photographs of an active HAA site have come to light from the Needs Ore ALG.

You can discover more about life at Yew Tree Heath AA gun site and nearby Ferny Crofts through the memories and photos of Leslie Isaac and Marjorie Readman who met here in 1943 and lived happily ever after.

Film Footage:

  • You can see a film all about the amazing Vickers Predictor device on the British Pathe YouTube page: Here
  • There is also some film footage of a major television outside broadcast showing viewers the workings of an anti-aircraft battery carried out in London: Here
  • British Pathe also has some footage of V1 flying rockets over the South Coast being engaged by AA Guns: Here
  • The date of the site’s clearance is not known, but it appears to be vacant in the RAF late 1946 aerial photograph.