Snapshot of Historic Postcard

Cataloguing old, indeed new, postcards is both a fascinating and instructive process. It gives one an insight into peoples’ views/opinions/feelings, and the older the postcard, the more interesting it is.

One example is that entitled “Views of Brockenhurst”, featuring five contemporaneous aspects of the village. It is dated the 17 June 1917 and when looking at the scenes one is immediately struck by the absence of both crowds and traffic.  If those scenes were to be photographed today (assuming they can all be replicated), no doubt they would be that much busier.

The writer does not leave us his name, but the card is addressed to “Dear Kate” – perhaps his sister in that there is a reference to his having written a long letter to “Mum” the previous week. We then learn that the writer is at an auxiliary hospital and in a “lovely marquee” enjoying a comfortable bed.  One imagines that he was a member of the armed forces and suffered injuries whilst on active service in that, poignantly, there is then a reference to his wounds healing up but “altogether too fast for my liking”, implying that he was due to be posted back to his corps somewhere in France.

He next refers to his having received Kate’s letter dated some two months earlier, the 17 April 1916. She seems to have suffered from appendicitis, though not badly.  We know all of this detail because of the clarity of the writing, almost akin to copperplate.

The card ends mid-sentence implying that it was accompanied by a second card, or perhaps a note. We shall never know.

One can only hope that our correspondent did indeed make a full recovery and was ultimately restored to his loved ones in full health after the Armistice.

You can find out more about the activities, sites and stories associated with the hospital by clicking here: No.1 New Zealand General Hospital

 

Who was Fred?

On the 4 February 1916 “GB” sent a postcard to, perhaps, a family member, “C”.  The picture on the card is of the watersplash in Brockenhurst, also known as Brookley Bridge, showing just four pedestrians going about their business – two ladies and two gentlemen.  GB mysteriously writes that “Fred” did not know the postcard was being send and that “C” should not mention the fact to Fred.  Happily, Fred seems to have been “getting on fine”, but then we read that our writer intended to “keep him another fortnight at least”.  The plot thickens .  Why should C not let Fred know the postcard had been received?  What was the relationship between the three?  Why was Fred being kept?  Was he perhaps recuperating from an illness?  Perhaps another family member spending time with GB?  Had Fred done something wrong and was staying with GB for a trial period – or as a punishment?

We then learn with some relief that C need not worry about Fred as he was “allright” and would be writing “next post”.  So, was Fred perhaps GB’s husband who did not want his wife to share with C whatever difficulties there had in fact been?  What was the secret?  Is the picture on the postcard relevant/does it itself convey a message?  Does it show Fred?

No doubt Agatha Christie would have relished such a scenario and developed it into yet another successful story.  A possible title comes to mind – “The Watersplash Conspiracy”.

It is a shame we will not find out the content of Fred’s next letter/card to C.  But perhaps it is better this way and we should not intrude into what was clearly a matter of concern for Fred.