Contributor:

‘description’:’Declines an invitation to dine on the 26th.’,’context’:’Halford Mss. HALFORD MSS II. CORRESPONDENCE AND PAPERS OF SIR HENRY HALFORD I, MAINLY MEDICAL.’,’held_by’:’Leicestershire, Leicester and Rutland, Record Office for’

‘description’:’He is sending the commission, which was unexpectedly delayed.’,’context’:’Halford Mss. HALFORD MSS II. CORRESPONDENCE AND PAPERS OF SIR HENRY HALFORD I, MAINLY MEDICAL. Baron Lyndhurst.’,’held_by’:’Leicestershire, Leicester and Rutland, Record Office for’

‘description’:'[C1797 M10]. Short title: Mapletoft v Hyde. Document type: Depositions. Plaintiffs: Matthew Mapletoft. Defendants: James Hyde, James Richards and James Piddle. amended by an order dated 12 June 1798: John Richards added as defendant.’,’context’:’Court of Chancery: Six Clerks Office: Pleadings 1801-1842. Division Two (Winter, Johnson and Turton): pleadings filed in the Six Clerks Office occupied successively by Winter, Johnson and Turton. Description available at other catalogue level.’,’held_by’:’The National Archives’

‘description’:'[C1797 W27]. Short title: Wollaston v Wollaston. Document type: bill and three answers. Plaintiffs: George Hyde Wollaston. Defendants: William Allen, John Fanshawe, William Hyde Wollaston, Frederick Hyde Wollaston, Charles Hyde Wollaston, Henry Septimus Hyde Wollaston, Francis John Hyde Wollaston, Mary Hyde Wollaston, Charles Hyde Wollaston, Catherine Hyde Wollaston, Henrietta Hyde Wollaston, Ann Hyde Wollaston, Amelia Hyde Wollaston, Sophia Hyde Wollaston, Louisa Decima Hyde Wollaston, Maria Catherine Hyde and Caroline Frances Hyde.’,’context’:’Court of Chancery: Six Clerks Office: Pleadings 1758 to 1800. PURCAS AND WINTER DIVISION. Study matters, described at item level. (Proceedings taken to the Record Rooms in this…’,’held_by’:’The National Archives’

‘description’:'[C1798 B16]. Short title: Barlow v Mullins. Document type: bill and answer. Plaintiffs: Henry Barlow and wife and others. Defendants: George Mullins and Edward Hale. JXP.’,’context’:’Court of Chancery: Six Clerks Office: Pleadings 1758 to 1800. PURCAS AND WINTER DIVISION. Study matters, described at item level. (Proceedings taken to the Record Rooms in this…’,’held_by’:’The National Archives’

‘description’:'[C1799 P3]. Short title: Page v Leapingwell. Document type: examination. Plaintiffs: Sir Thomas Hyde Page and another. Defendants: George Leapingwell, Thomas Shuker, Ann Pugh, Sarah Ostler, John Page, George Page, Robert Page, Mary Albina Page, Ann Page, Ann Perry, Robert Langley, William Bird and Maurice Pugh. revived Easter 1709 and supplementary bill Easter 1811.’,’context’:’Court of Chancery: Six Clerks Office: Pleadings 1758 to 1800. PURCAS AND WINTER DIVISION. Mr Bicknell’s Records sorted 1800: Depositions and Examinations P-W Plaintiffs: Described at item level….’,’held_by’:’The National Archives’

‘description’:'[C1799 P3]. Short title: Page v Leapingwell. Document type: examination. Plaintiffs: Sir Thomas Hyde Page and another. Defendants: George Leapingwell, Thomas Shuker, Ann Pugh, Sarah Ostler, John Page, George Page, Robert Page, Mary Albina Page, Ann Page, Ann Perry, Robert Langley, William Bird and Maurice Pugh. revived Easter 1709 and supplementary bill Easter 1811.’,’context’:’Court of Chancery: Six Clerks Office: Pleadings 1758 to 1800. PURCAS AND WINTER DIVISION. Study matters, described at item level. (Proceedings taken to the Record Rooms in this…’,’held_by’:’The National Archives’

‘description’:'[C1801 C35]. Short title: Call v Rashleigh. Document type: Bill and three answers. Plaintiffs: George Cotsford Call. Defendants: John Rashleigh, John Coryton, Thomas Rashleigh, John Elliott, John Pybus, John Grant and Pagen Hale. SMP.’,’context’:’Court of Chancery: Six Clerks Office: Pleadings 1801-1842. Division Two (Winter, Johnson and Turton): pleadings filed in the Six Clerks Office occupied successively by Winter, Johnson and Turton. Study matters, described at item level. (Proceedings taken to the Record Rooms in this…’,’held_by’:’The National Archives’

‘description’:'[C1802 L15]. Short title: Leeds Duke of v Hatfield. Document type: Bill and answer. Plaintiffs: George William Frederick [Osborne] Duke of Leeds. Defendants: William [FitzWilliam] Earl Fitzwilliam, Walter Spencer Stanhope, Sarah Hatfield, Dorothe Hatfield, Susan Hatfield, Catherine Hatfield, William Provis Wickham and wife, Annabella Provis Wickham (junior), Stevens Dineley Totton (abroad), Henry Vernon, Richard William Howard Vyse and Thomas Conolly. original bill Trinity 1794. SMP.’,’context’:’Court of Chancery: Six Clerks Office: Pleadings 1801-1842. Division Two (Winter, Johnson and Turton): pleadings filed in the Six Clerks Office occupied successively by Winter, Johnson and Turton. Study matters, described at item level. (Proceedings taken to the Record Rooms in this…’,’held_by’:’The National Archives’

‘description’:'[C1802 L15]. Short title: Leeds Duke of v Wickham. Document type: Answer (Not filed). Plaintiffs: George William Frederick [Osborne] Duke of Leeds. Defendants: William [FitzWilliam] Earl Fitzwilliam, Walter Spencer Stanhope, Sarah Hatfield, Dorothe Hatfield, Susan Hatfield, Catherine Hatfield, William Provis Wickham and wife, Annabella Provis Wickham (junior), Stevens Dineley Totton (abroad), Henry Vernon, Richard William Howard Vyse and Thomas Conolly. original bill Trinity 1794.’,’context’:’Court of Chancery: Six Clerks Office: Pleadings 1801-1842. Division Four (Ford and Vesey): pleadings filed in the Six Clerks Office occupied successively by Ford and Vesey. Mr Wainewrights Records sorted 1829. Pleadings.’,’held_by’:’The National Archives’